Catalogue description Bernard v Bernard, dated 1719. Berrow alias Hobart v Hobart, dated 1662. Berzini and...

Ordering and viewing options

This record has not been digitised and cannot be downloaded.

You can order records in advance to be ready for you when you visit Kew. You will need a reader's ticket to do this. Or, you can request a quotation for a copy to be sent to you.

Details of DEL 2/9
Reference: DEL 2/9
Description:

  • Bernard v Bernard, dated 1719.
  • Berrow alias Hobart v Hobart, dated 1662.
  • Berzini and Smith v Rudder, dated 1703.
  • Best v Best, dated 1824-25.
  • Bestoso v de Cassares, dated 1708.
  • Bethell v Lovegrove and Dench, dated 1770-72. see also DEL 8/74
  • The Betsey, i.e. Ridley v Leach, dated 1804-05. See also DEL 2/14
  • Bichard v Le Cras, dated 1702-04. see also DEL 8/74
  • Bidlake v Sergeant, dated 1673.
  • [Bill, Lady Diana, deceased], dated 1687.
  • Billingsley v Lukin, dated 1708.
  • Bingham v Portland, dated 1793. See also DEL 2/14
  • [Binion, Sir George, deceased], dated 1670.
  • Bird v Bird, dated 1829. See also DEL 2/14
  • Bird v Nicholls, dated 1791.
  • Bird v Smith and Cotton, dated 1727.
  • Bishop v Collet and Blomfield, dated 1704.
  • Bisse and Freeman v Sparrow alias Morgan], dated 1727-29.
  • Blackett v Rolle, dated [undated]. See DEL 2/10
  • Blackham v Wright and Shelton, dated 1709.
  • Blackwood (formerly Jansen) and Blackwood v Damer, dated 1780.
  • Blake v Blake, dated 1761-63.
  • Blake v Coghlan, dated 1761-63.

Date: 1662-1829
Held by: The National Archives, Kew
Legal status: Public Record(s)
Closure status: Open Document, Open Description

Have you found an error with this catalogue description?

Help with your research