Catalogue description Arnold v Holles, dated 1663. Arthur v Arthur, dated 1720. Arthur v Law and Dunkin, dated...

Ordering and viewing options

This record has not been digitised and cannot be downloaded.

You can order records in advance to be ready for you when you visit Kew. You will need a reader's ticket to do this. Or, you can request a quotation for a copy to be sent to you.

Details of DEL 2/4
Reference: DEL 2/4
Description:

  • Arnold v Holles, dated 1663.
  • Arthur v Arthur, dated 1720.
  • Arthur v Law and Dunkin, dated 1667.
  • Ash v Ash, dated 1708.
  • Ash v Williams and Smith, dated 1685.
  • Ashdown v Edmead, dated 1685.
  • Ashton v Noden, dated 1705-06.
  • Askew v all persons, dated 1780.
  • Ast v Mayafee, dated 1796-97.
  • Atfen v Atfen, dated 1705. see also DEL 8/74
  • Astry v Duncombe, dated 1678. see also DEL 8/74
  • Atkinson v Atkinson, dated 1825-27. see also DEL 2/5
  • Atkinson v Barwick, dated 1699.
  • The Atlas, i.e. (Fletcher et al. v Chalmers and Fletcher et al. v Inglis and Spankie), dated 1827. See also box 5 below
  • Attwood v Eyre, dated 1730-40.
  • Atwater and Bruce v Clewer, dated [no date].
  • Atwill v Buller, dated 1705.
  • Austin v Cock, dated 1722.
  • [Awdeley Family Leases and Papers], dated c 1661. see also DEL 8/74
  • Ayliffe v Ayliffe, dated 1680.
  • Aylmer v Annesley, dated 1791-92.
  • Ayres v Hedges, dated 1654.

Date: 1654-1827
Held by: The National Archives, Kew
Legal status: Public Record(s)
Closure status: Open Document, Open Description

Have you found an error with this catalogue description?

Help with your research