Catalogue description Palatinate of Chester: Exchequer of Chester, and Courts of Great Sessions of Wales: Unpublished Depositions

Search within or browse this series to find specific records of interest.

Date range

Details of CHES 12
Reference: CHES 12
Title: Palatinate of Chester: Exchequer of Chester, and Courts of Great Sessions of Wales: Unpublished Depositions
Description:

This series consists of unpublished depositions relating to equity proceedings in the Exchequer Court of the Palatinate of Chester from the reign of Elizabeth I until the late eighteenth century and similar records of the North Wales, Chester, and Brecon circuits of the Welsh Courts of Great Sessions in the seventeenth, eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. The cases for which they were made probably settled before final hearings, and so the depositions were never published.

Suits before the court were initiated by a complaint in the form of a written petition from one party (plaintiff) alleging some wrongful action on the part of another party (defendant). The defendant replied with a statement of his own known as an answer. Further statements could be made by both parties. These claims and counterclaims are known collectively as pleadings.

The court determined these disputes on the basis of evidence brought before it in the form of written depositions. These were answers, given by witnesses and sometimes the parties themselves, to a series of questions known as interrogatories, prepared by each party in the dispute. Assumed to be impartial, specific depositions provide details about a dispute which may not be clear from the biased claims of the parties alone.

Deponents were normally sworn to tell the truth and examined in isolation. The questions were read one at a time and the answers recorded verbatim in English. Deponents were not to reveal their answers until after all the testimony was made public (or published) by the court. This took place prior to the final hearing of the suit when the court gave its judgement. The commissioners usually signed the interrogatories and the depositions.

Many depositions include a note of the circumstances in which they were made as in the following example from 1641. "Deposicion of witnesses taken at [place and date] before [names of commissioners] by vertue of a Comission to them directed out of his majesties most honorable Corte of eschequer at Chester for examinacion of witnesses in a cause there dependinge". At the beginning of each deposition the name, place of residence, age and occupation of the deponent is recorded which makes these documents of great interest to genealogists and social historians.

Although this series mainly contains depositions, it should be noted that some pieces may contain other items. These include original, or draft, depositions (from which the formal copies were made and commissions for the taking of a defendant's answer accompanied by the answer and a copy of the plaintiff's original bill.

Date: c1558-c1800
Arrangement:

Normally depositions were returned to the court where they were opened and examined. However, these depositions were returned to the court but never opened, the seals of the commissioners, for the most part, being unbroken. The most common reason for this was that the disputes to which they were linked were settled before the matters came to final hearings and so the evidence contained in the depositions was not needed.

The documents are mainly on parchment, although there are some paper documents. Apart from the Latin commissions noted above they are all written in English, being folded into packets of various sizes. At some point in the past a number of the depositions in this series have had their seals broken so the contents may now be read. An examination of these reveals that each packet follows the standard pattern for files of equity depositions. Each one contains the commission authorising the taking of the depositions, the interrogatories put to each witness and the depositions made by them.

The packets are usually annotated on the outside sheet with the names of the parties and a statement relating to the delivery of the packet to the court. The date when the packet was delivered and/or the year in which the depositions were made are often noted. These annotations are often accompanied by the signature of the court official who took delivery of the packet. These and other annotations may be in English or Latin.

The packets were addressed differently according to whether they were being returned to the Chester Exchequer or one of the Courts of Great Sessions. The former were addressed to "Prepotentissimo/Excellentissimo domino Regi in scaccario suo Cestr'" or "Serenissimae Dominae Elizabethae... etc." The latter were addressed to the "Chief Justice [or] Justices of Great Sessions of [name of circuit] in the court of Chancery there." Readers should not attempt to open or disturb any sealed files in this series.

The packets or files of sealed depositions are not arranged in any date order being simply packed in boxes and there is as yet no catalogue giving details of the individual packets.

Separated material:

Most of the other records of the Great Sessions of Wales are now at the National Library of Wales.

Held by: The National Archives, Kew
Legal status: Public Record(s)
Language: English and Latin
Creator:

Court of Great Sessions of Brecon, 1540-1830

Court of Great Sessions of North Wales, 1540-1830

Palatinate of Chester, Courts of Great Sessions of Chester and Flint, 1540-1830

Palatinate of Chester, Exchequer of Chester, 1297-1830

Physical description: 4 bundle(s)
Administrative / biographical background:

Between 1536 and 1543 a new judicial system was established across Wales with local administration being based on the long-standing English model of sheriffs, coroners and justices of the peace. Above the local level were four Courts of Great Sessions, modelled on similar courts operating in the principality of Wales from 1280. Each of the four courts had jurisdiction over a circuit: North Wales (Anglesey, Caernarfon and Merioneth); Carmarthen (Camarthen, Cardigan and Pembroke); Brecon (Brecon, Glamorgan and Radnor); Chester (Flint, Denbigh, Montgomery and the Palatinate of Chester).

This last circuit was a little different from the others in that it was formed by adding responsibility for Denbigh and Montgomery to the existing Chester Court of Great Sessions which had enjoyed all civil and criminal jurisdiction in the Palatinate of Chester and neighbouring Flint from the early middle ages. Each circuit was presided over by a justice, a second being added in 1576. Writs were issued by a prothonotary in each circuit who also entered the records of the court from his office, known at first as the exchequer and later, as the chancery. The courts covered all matters which in England were handled by the Courts of King's Bench and Common Pleas.

Originally, the Courts of Great Sessions did not encompass an equitable jurisdiction. However, at some point in the seventeenth century the courts began to hear matters of equity. Following the opinion of William Black, who surveyed the records of the courts in 1840, it has generally been held that it was the abolition, in 1689, of the Court of the Council of Wales with its equitable jurisdiction, that prompted the Courts of Great Sessions to take on this role. Black based his opinion on the fact that during his survey, which was far from complete, he found no equity records earlier than 1688. However records from the equity side of the Courts of Great Sessions from before 1688 are in existence, the earliest discovered being dated 1649.

It should be noted that in the Chester circuit only equity matters originating in the three Welsh counties (Flint, Denbigh and Montgomery) were heard in the Court of Great Sessions; suits from the Palatinate being heard, of course, by the Chester Exchequer Court.

In 1830 the separate Welsh jurisdiction was abolished by the same act that ended the life of the Chester Exchequer.

Have you found an error with this catalogue description?

Help with your research