Catalogue description General Register Office: Registers of Clandestine Marriages and of Baptisms in the Fleet Prison, King's Bench Prison, the Mint and the May Fair Chapel
|Title:||General Register Office: Registers of Clandestine Marriages and of Baptisms in the Fleet Prison, King's Bench Prison, the Mint and the May Fair Chapel|
Principally registers, 1667-c1777 (with some indexes, 1698-1754) and note books, 1682-1774, giving particulars of clandestine marriages and baptisms performed in the Fleet Prison, at the May Fair Chapel, at King's Bench Prison or within the Mint, as well as entries in the Fleet registers of other ceremonies performed at these places.
This series records the marriages of a significant proportion of the population of London and surrounding areas up to 1754. The 'Report of the Commission into Marriage Law' of 1868 estimated that countrywide in the first half of the eighteenth century, a third of all marriages were actually clandestine. Of these, the Fleet registers in this series are the most significant source, containing an estimated 400,000 entries representing over 200,000 weddings.
Most of the registers include the full names of the couples, their marital status, their residences (generally parishes), usually the groom's occupation, and the minister's name or initials. Some registers, however, only give Christian names. For sailors, the name of the ship is sometimes given. Some of the registers include other non-marriage related matters, whilst some may be found to contain directions to the local marriage house.
The notebooks often contain information and comments which are additional to that included in the registers, and in some cases the registers may not have survived at all. Some of the notebooks were general purpose books, and include other non-marriage related details.
Electronic images of these records can be searched online through our partner website.
The registers are listed in chronological order. Physically, they are now bound in volumes. For many pieces there are several registers bound together in one binding, and it should be noted that the physical distinction between the original registers inside these bindings is not always clearly defined. Within the registers, most of the entries are arranged chronologically, although a number are arranged alphabetically by first letter of groom's surname with the entries for each letter then arranged in chronological order. It is common in the registers for entries to be written on the inside covers, and also, confusingly, for them to run in reverse-order through the volumes, on backs of pages. Some registers contain integral indexes.
The indexes refer to some of the registers but not to any of the notebooks. Like the registers, they are also arranged in chronological order, with the internal indexing based upon the first letter of the male surname. The name of the bride also sometimes shown.
The bulk of the notebooks are arranged in alphabetical order of the name of the compiler of the notebooks (usually the minister) with the notebooks then arranged chronologically underneath the compiler's name. These are then followed by two sequences of unidentified notebooks and conclude with a series of miscellaneous notebooks. As with the registers, there was a common practice for details to be entered on the inside covers.
A Fleet register, March 1725 to January 1731, is contained in the Rawlinson Manuscripts at the Bodleian Library, Oxford (MS Rawlinson B 360). There are three May Fair registers, covering the period 1735 to 1754, held at the church of St George, Hanover Square, London.
Two volumes of Fleet registers, dated 1726 to 1735, which were brought into the Prerogative Court of Canterbury as evidence are in:
|Held by:||The National Archives, Kew|
|Legal status:||Public Record(s)|
|Physical description:||835 volume(s)|
|Access conditions:||Available in digital format|
|Immediate source of acquisition:||
From 1961 General Register Office
|Custodial history:||The documents are unauthenticated and are without any clearly documented provenance. After the outlawing of clandestine marriages in 1754, these registers remained in private hands, being bought by private individuals who then charged the public for making searches. Gradually a large collection built-up and in 1821, for a sum of £260 6s 6d, the government purchased from a Mr William Cox, the bulk of the registers and notebooks which now comprise this series. Under the direction of Lord Sidmouth, secretary of state for the Home Department, these were then deposited in the Registry of the Consistory Court of London where they were held until 1840 when transferred to the newly established General Register Office .|
The Register of Baptisms and Marriages at St George's Chapel, May Fair The Publications of The Harleian Society, Volume XV, 1889 Anthony Benton 'Marry'd in their Closets...', The Genealogists' Magazine, Volume 23 (1989-1991), pp 649-656 Tony Benton Irregular Marriages in London before 1754 Society of Genealogists, 1993 Roger Lee Brown 'The Rise and Fall of the Fleet Marriages', Marriage and Society ed R B Outhwaite, London, 1981, pp 117-136 J S Burn The Fleet Registers 1833 Beric Lloyd The Fleet Forgeries 1987 H Peskett Guide to the Parish and Non-parochial Registers of Devon and Cornwall, 1558-1837: Extra Series, Volume 2 Devon and Cornwall Record Society, 1979 D J Steel, Sources of Births, Marriages and Deaths before 1837 (I), National Index of Parish Registers, Volume I, 1968 ), chapter IV pp 292-321.
|Unpublished finding aids:||
Index compiled by Beric Lloyd is available at The National Archives at Kew. Boyd's Marriage Index is an index of all English marriages from various sources for the period 1538 to 1837. A fuller description of the origin and context of the records is filed with the paper catalogues in the reading rooms at The National Archives.
|Administrative / biographical background:||
In the 1740s, over half of all London weddings were held at the Fleet (over 6500 per year) with a further thousand conducted at the May Fair Chapel.
By the late 17th century, provided that a couple exchanged vows and had some proof of this, then a marriage would be considered valid. Marriages by a form of ceremony conducted by an ordained clergyman, but without banns or licence, and generally not in a church or chapel, usually away from the parish of the bride or groom were termed clandestine marriages. The main appeal of clandestine marriages was seemingly for reasons of cost. Other reasons for their popularity included the avoidance of the need to obtain parental consent, and also to conceal embarrassing pregnancies.
Clandestine marriages began to grow in numbers from the middle of the seventeenth century. The authorities attempted to quell this growth by introducing three parliamentary acts between 1694 and 1696 which collectively regulated marriages, introduced marriage taxes and censured and suspended clergy found to be involved. These, however, only applied to marriage centres which came under the jurisdiction (or visitation) of the bishop of the diocese. These acts inadvertently gave a near monopoly to private marriage centres outside the bishop's visitation (e.g. prisons) and to clergymen (many of whom were prisoners) who had been dismissed or were in debt and who had nothing to lose by conducting clandestine, fee-paying marriages.
In 1711, Parliament passed legislation which included an attempt to deal with the problem of such clandestine marriages being conducted in prisons. A clause was included in the act to counter the loss of revenue (from non-payment of stamp duties) caused by clandestine marriages. The clause continued the imposition of fines for any person in 'holy orders' conducting a marriage but also introduced the same fine for any prison keeper who permitted such a marriage at his prison. While this prevented the marriages being performed inside the prisons, it did not prevent them being conducted in other locations in the vicinity of the prisons: e.g. the Liberties (or Rules) of the Fleet, or the Mint (for King's Bench Prison). On 25 March 1754, all clandestine marriages were made illegal by Lord Hardwicke's Marriage Act; although couples were still able to travel to other areas of the United Kingdom where the act did not apply: i.e. across the border into Scotland (e.g. Gretna Green), or to the Channel Islands and the Isle of Man.
Fleet Prison was primarily a debtors prison and stood on the east bank of the Fleet River in what is now Farringdon Street, London. The marriages performed at the Fleet involved all classes from London and the surrounding counties, but mainly catered for artisans, farmers, labourers and craftsmen from the poorer parishes of London, soldiers (including Chelsea Pensioners), and particularly sailors. King's Bench Prison was located on the east side of Borough High Street in Southwark. As with the Fleet, the majority of prisoners were debtors. Relatively few marriages were performed in the Prison itself, and by the 1740s, those marriages which had been performed in the Mint began to be held at the Fleet. The King's Bench and the Mint, because of their location, tended to attract a high proportion of couples from Kent and Surrey.
From the late 1720s, clandestine marriages commenced at May Fair, which eventually became only second to the Fleet in terms of notoriety for such marriages. Initially, May Fair marriages were performed at St George's Chapel, Curzon Street, Mayfair, near Hyde Park Corner then, from 1744, at a private dwelling house (the 'New' or 'Little Chapel') situated ten yards away from St George's Chapel. Whereas clandestine marriages performed at the Fleet and King's Bench prisons and surrounding areas tended to attract the working classes, the May Fair Chapel was used by professional classes and the aristocracy for marriages, including the Dukes of Cleveland and Hamilton, Lord Stanley, and Lord George Bentinck .
The need for a public record of the marriages meant that they were recorded in registers and some were produced as evidence in court cases. The registers of the Fleet were kept, for the most part, by the ministers (or their clerks) who performed the ceremonies, by self-appointed register-keepers, by the landlords of some of the houses where the ceremonies took place, and by persons who appear to have set up record offices at a later date and made copies of registers in the possession of others. It must be emphasised that the information in the Fleet documents (particularly those before 1714) should be treated with extreme caution as dates given are unreliable and names or indeed whole entries may be fictitious.
Have you found an error with this catalogue description? Let us know