Catalogue description Committee on Intermediaries (Herbert Committee): Records
Reference: | T 167 |
---|---|
Title: | Committee on Intermediaries (Herbert Committee): Records |
Description: |
Records of the Committee on Intermediaries (Herbert Committee). It contains minutes of the 21 meetings, memoranda submitted by various government departments and other bodies, and papers concerning the composition and terms of reference of the Committee. T 167/8 is a printed copy of the final report of the committee. |
Date: | 1949-1950 |
Arrangement: |
Arrangement is by date order of the files. |
Held by: | The National Archives, Kew |
Legal status: | Public Record(s) |
Language: | English |
Creator: |
Treasury, Committee on Intermediaries, 1949-1950 |
Physical description: | 8 files and volumes |
Access conditions: | Open |
Immediate source of acquisition: |
Treasury ,date not known. |
Accruals: | No future accruals expected |
Administrative / biographical background: |
The Committee on Intermediaries (Herbert Committee) was set up in 1949 under the chairmanship of Sir Edwin Savory Herbert, an eminent solicitor, company director and public servant. The appointment of the Herbert Committee arose out of the report of the Tribunal of Enquiry, presided over by Mr Justice Lynskey, which had been set up in 1948 to enquire into the activities of individuals known as"contact men" or intermediaries. The terms of reference of the Committee on Intermediaries were:
The inquiry did not intended to cover the activities on behalf of their clients by members of recognised professions. It was a Treasury controlled enquiry, with some advice from outside the government service. Its report was presented directly to the Prime Minister, Clement Attlee. The first meeting was held on the 1st March 1949. Twenty-one meetings were held, and the Committee published its report in March 1950 Report of the Committee on Intermediaries, March 1950, Cmd 7904 The committee examined the role of intermediaries, and the mechanisms of liaison between representatives of trade and industry, and private individuals with Government Departments. Most of the evidence submitted came from government departments, which were divided into 5 groups for the purposes of the inquiry GROUP I
GROUP II
GROUP III
GROUP IV
GROUP V
|
Have you found an error with this catalogue description? Let us know