Catalogue description Court of Wards and Liveries: Inquisitions Post Mortem

Search within or browse this series to find specific records of interest.

Date range

Details of WARD 7
Reference: WARD 7
Title: Court of Wards and Liveries: Inquisitions Post Mortem
Description:

This series contains duplicates of the Chancery series of inquisitions post mortem sent to the Court of Wards and Liveries for use in the administration of wardships and grants of livery, and inquisitions of lands of lunatics and idiots.

Date: Henry VIII - Charles I
Arrangement:

By regnal year

Related material:

Inquisitions post mortem of the estates of tenants-in-chief, idiots and lunatics can also be found in: For inquisitions post mortem concerning estates within the palatinates of Lancaster and Chester see:

C 142

CHES 3

CHES 7

E 150

PL 4

For contemporary abstracts and indexes, see WARD 9

Held by: The National Archives, Kew
Legal status: Public Record(s)
Language: English and Latin
Physical description: 103 bundles and volumes
Publication note:

Index of Inquisitions Post Mortem, Henry VIII-Philip and Mary, Lists and Indexes, XXIII (London, 1907). Index of Inquisitions Post Mortem, Elizabeth I, Lists and Indexes, XXVI (London, 1908). Index of Inquisitions Post Mortem, James I, Lists and Indexes, XXXI (London, 1909). Index of Inquisitions Post Mortem, Charles I and later, Lists and Indexes, XXXIII (London, 1909). Hints on interpreting the Public Records III - Inquisitions post mortem, R E Latham, The Amateur Historian, I (1952-1954), pp 77-81. Proofs of age, E Gillett, The Amateur Historian, V (1961-1963), pp 224-230. Documents in the Public Record Office - 2. Inquisitions post mortem, Mary McGuiness, ' The Amateur Historian, VI (1963-1965), pp 235-242.

Administrative / biographical background:

Inquisitions post mortem were hearings conducted before juries summoned by the sheriff and normally presided over by a crown official - an escheator in most instances - which typically were held by mandate of a chancery writ requiring a return of the value and terms of tenure of an estate held by a lately-deceased, the identity and age of the heir, heiress or co-heiresses to such an estate, and the date of the late tenant's death. With the establishment of the Court of Wards, the issue of the Chancery writ to the Escheator on the death of a tenant-in-chief of the crown was authorised by a warrant from the Master, Surveyor, Attorney or Receiver of the Court of Wards. These officials received the information that a tenant-in-chief of the crown had died, and that an inquisition was therefore due, either from the heir himself, or from the local Escheator or Feodary, who had a duty to inform the court.

Escheators did have the power to take inquisitions on their own authority. However, the Court of Wards distrusted the impartiality of the escheators, and succeeded in restricting this power of independent action to estates worth under £5 a year. In addition, the Escheator was increasingly bypassed by the issue of special commissions, so that few inquisitions were taken before the escheators in the seventeenth century. The court often ordered further inquisitions (ad melius inquirendum) when the Feodary's survey of the lands indicated that they had been undervalued by the escheator.

The purpose of the inquisitions was to ensure the correct identification and assessment of all properties which ought to be in the king's hands by reason of escheat (for want of an heir or because of forfeiture) or by right of wardship or marriage (of heirs under twenty-one and heiresses under fourteen).

Certain hearings ancillary to the inquisitions are properly associated with them and were conducted in like manner. They were most frequently held in order to obtain full extents of estates, prove the ages of heirs and heiresses, and assign dower to widows.

The jury's findings were returned within one month to Chancery as an indenture, along with any associated documentation - which would most commonly include the Chancery writ, if one had been issued, endorsed as having been carried out: a duplicate indenture was kept by the escheator. The clerks of the Petty Bag in Chancery sent transcripts of those inquisitions to the Court of Wards when the deceased tenant had been found to hold in chief of the crown: these were kept as a working archive by the court, to become the basis of the crown's case at the taking of later inquisitions.

Have you found an error with this catalogue description?