Court of Appeal under the Benefices Act 1898: Files

J 142
Court of Appeal under the Benefices Act 1898: Files

With the exception of a file concerning fees, 1899 to 1922, these are case files from 1901 relating to the Court of Appeal under the Benefices Act 1898, including those in respect of cases which were subsequently withdrawn.

Held by:
The National Archives, Kew
Legal status:
Public Record
Physical description:
12 file(s)
Access conditions:
Subject to 30 year closure
Administrative / biographical background:

Under section 2 of the Benefices Act 1898 a bishop had the power to refuse to institute or admit a presentee to a benefice on certain grounds: that there were irregularities in the transfer of the right of patronage of the benefice; that at the date of presentation not more than three years had elapsed since the presentee was ordained deacon; or, that the presentee was unfit for the discharge of his duties.

Where a bishop had taken this action, under section 3 of the 1898 act the presentee or the person presenting to the benefice could appeal to a court consisting of the archbishop of the province in which the benefice lay and a judge of the Supreme Court nominated by the Lord Chancellor.

Under section 9 of the act a bishop also had the power to appoint a curate and thus inhibit the incumbent from performing his ecclesiastical duties. The incumbent could appeal against the bishop's action to the court constituted under the act.

Subsequent amending legislation, in particular the Benefices (Ecclesiastical Duties) Measure 1926, retained the substance of the 1898 Act.

Found an error? Suggest a correction to help improve our descriptions.

Suggest a correction for this record

Fields marked with * are mandatory.

Your details

If you provide your details, we will contact you within 10 working days if we cannot act on your suggestion

User Tags

Users have not yet tagged this record

  • You need to sign in to tag records. If you don't have an account please register.

User Collaboration

Use the form below to include your knowledge of this record. If your description includes any citable references, please add these to the "Citable References?" field on the right, remebering to seperate each reference with a comma, for example (FO 176/1/1, FO 178/2/1, and so on...)

Citable References?